<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AlexLey.com &#187; romance of science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexley.com/tag/romance-of-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexley.com</link>
	<description>PhoSci: Photography, Science &#38; Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 07:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Math is no fun for lobsters</title>
		<link>http://www.alexley.com/2009/01/27/math-is-no-fun-for-lobsters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexley.com/2009/01/27/math-is-no-fun-for-lobsters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AlexL</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invertebrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romance of science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexley.com/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A lobster doesn&#8217;t get to think about the laws of nature, and so I&#8217;ve often thought to myself that it&#8217;s a blessing that we live in a certain window of intelligence. If we were infinitely smart—God-like—we&#8217;ll have such powerful brains we can see every implication of everything, so math wouldn&#8217;t be fun for a being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;A lobster doesn&#8217;t get to think about the laws of nature, and so I&#8217;ve often thought to myself that it&#8217;s a blessing that we live in a certain window of intelligence. If we were infinitely smart—God-like—we&#8217;ll have such powerful brains we can see every implication of everything, so math wouldn&#8217;t be fun for a being that&#8217;s too smart. And of course for the lobster that&#8217;s not smart enough, math is no fun for them, either. It&#8217;s in this intermediate window where math and science become something to rejoice in.&#8221;<br />
—Steve Strogatz, mathematician</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m finally listening to the most recent episode of Radio Lab, &#8220;<a href="http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/episodes/2008/12/12">Yellow Fluff and Other Curious Encounters</a>,&#8221; and I just fell in love with Steve Strogatz&#8217;s quote. I had to pause, rewind, and play the podcast over a dozen times before I was able to write it down, word-for-word. It embodies some of the reasons why I love science, and why I&#8217;m capable of being fascinated by it. Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexley.com/2009/01/27/math-is-no-fun-for-lobsters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.708 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-07-23 05:36:58 -->
